What we aim for, what we have tested, what we know is imperfect and how to tell us when something does not work. Last updated 3 August 2026.

We aim to meet the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 at level AA on this website. We treat accessibility as part of building a site rather than as a remediation exercise afterwards, and we hold the sites we build for clients to the same standard.
This statement describes the current position honestly, including where we fall short. A statement that claims perfection is not useful to anybody.
We test with automated tooling on every build, and manually with keyboard-only navigation and with a screen reader on the pages that carry the main journeys. Automated testing alone catches only a portion of real problems, which is why the manual pass exists.
We are aware of the following and are working on them.
If you cannot use part of this site, we want to know, and we will treat it as a defect rather than a suggestion. Contact us through the form on this site, or ask for an alternative contact route if the form itself is the problem.
We aim to acknowledge accessibility reports within two working days and to tell you what we intend to do and by when.
For law firm clients, accessibility is part of the build rather than an add-on, and it matters commercially as well as ethically. It matters most acutely in practice areas whose clients are defined by disability — a disability practice whose own contact form cannot be completed with a screen reader is losing the clients it exists to serve.